AI fails Lakhovsky MWO
I asked Google AI
"AI in response to "Curing Cancer with Ultra Radio Frequencies by Georges Lakhovsky" you replied "The positive outcomes Lakhovsky reported were anecdotal and lacked scientific rigor, with no clinical trials to validate the claims." There are many studies today that support the use of frequencies to treat illness and disease. Why are there no clinical trials when this would benefit humanity and the trials should be easy and inexpensive to do?"
The AI provided the following lame answer "There are no widespread clinical trials for using ultra radio frequencies to cure cancer because historical claims of success lacked scientific basis, modern approaches are still in early stages of research, and the rigorous process required for proper trials is extremely complex and expensive. Despite the potential for benefit, modern medicine cannot simply proceed with human trials based on anecdotal evidence, as Lakhovsky did. "
Yes, there are a number of studies and trials that show frequencies do work.